英超官方解释布伦特福德点球被取消:瓦塔拉处于越位位置(英超官方释疑:布伦特福德点球被判无效,瓦塔拉越位在先)
发布时间:2026-01-01

Explaining offside scenarios

I think the user wants a breakdown of an offside scenario involving a teammate influencing a defender, leading to a foul and a VAR review. If an attacker in an offside position impacts the defender or gains an advantage, the penalty doesn't count, and the game restarts with an indirect free kick. I could provide a simple explanation covering phases, interference, and actions affecting play. Maybe I should ask if the user wants a quick explainer or an official statement!Clarifying network browsing

响对手

I’m considering that the network might be enabled by default, but I shouldn’t browse unless the user specifically asks for it. It seems wise to ask a clarifying question before proceeding. I could provide a concise explanation as well, maybe using bullet points to outline a timeline. As for including a generic example, I could reference Dango Ouattara, but I need to be careful not to state any incorrect match details. That’s important!Explaining the VAR decision

I need to provide a concise explanation of the referee's decision. It started with a penalty awarded to Brentford for a challenge in the box. However, a VAR check revealed that an attacker, Watta'ra, was offside in the attacking phase and interfered with an opponent. Since the offside occurred before the foul, it takes precedence, restarting play with an indirect free kick for the defending team. This aligns with Law 11 on interference and the VAR protocol on clear errors.

要点解释(简明):

cover

  • 现场判罚:主裁先给了布伦特福德点球。
  • VAR复核:在点球前的进攻阶段,瓦塔拉处于越位位置,并对防守方产生了影响(干扰/参与争抢/明显动作影响对手)。
  • 规则依据:按竞赛规则第11条(越位),若进攻方队友越位并“干扰对手”或“参与比赛”,越位在先,后续的犯规/点球被推翻。
  • 结果处理:改判为防守方在越位地点的间接任意球;点球取消。
  • 关键判定点:仅“站在越位位置”不自动犯规;必须对比赛或对手产生可辨识影响。VAR确认有影响,才会推翻点球。

需要我把具体场面逐帧复盘(触球/对抗/越位线)或找官方通报原文吗?